Acrodus keuperinus
No picture of Acrodus keuperinus was found. Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Acrodus keuperinus itself, so it was not used. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Acrodus keuperinus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- AcrodusPBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Chondrichthyes
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Chondrichthyes
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Chondrichthyes
Time the record covers
At most 36 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 237 Mya and 201.4 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
5 occurrences of Acrodus keuperinus on record, most of them in the Late Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrences- Late Triassic100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Acrodus keuperinus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Acrodus keuperinus and its relatives
Late TriassicWhere Acrodus keuperinus and its relatives were recorded in the Late Triassic.
Found in the same rock
No other named taxon is catalogued from any of those sites.
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Acrodus keuperinus, and this reads all of them.
Entered from
2 references- Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History) Part 14
- On the upper formations of the New Red System in Gloucestershire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, showing that the Red (Saliferous) marls with an included band of sandstone, represent the Keuper or Marnes iriseés, and that the underlying sandstone of Ombersley, Bromsgrove and Warwick, is part of the 'Bunter Sandstein,' or 'Grès bigarré' of foreign geologists1
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Acrodus keuperinus was found. Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Acrodus keuperinus itself, so it was not used.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Acrodus keuperinus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itAcrodus through timeFormations of the Late TriassicThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Murchison and Strickland 1837)