Acrothelle sp.

No picture of Acrothelle sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Acrothelle sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 52 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 538.8 Mya and 486.85 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Cambrian — about 1 of 1 occurrenceCambrianOrdovician — about 0 of 1 occurrence540–538 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences538–536 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences536–534 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences534–533 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences533–531 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences531–529 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences529–527 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences527–525 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences525–524 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences524–522 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences522–520 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences520–518 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences518–516 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences516–515 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences515–513 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences513–511 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences511–509 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences509–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–504 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences504–502 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences502–500 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences500–498 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences498–497 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences497–495 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences495–493 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences493–491 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences491–489 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences489–488 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences488–486 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences540 Mya486 Mya

1 occurrence of Acrothelle sp. on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Deymenskaya, Veselovskaya, Ladushkinskaya — 54.67°N, 21.28°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Acrothelle sp. has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Acrothelle sp. and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Acrothelle sp. and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

5 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Acrothelle sp., and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Acrothelle sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Acrothelle sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Acrothelle sp. was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.