Amaurotoma

No picture of Amaurotoma was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Amaurotoma, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
MicrodomatidaePBDB
Diet
detritivorePBDB, for Microdomatidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Microdomatidae
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Euomphaloidea
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At least 68 million years on record.

The record covers at least 335.4 Mya to 266.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 346.7 Mya to 264.28 Mya.

Carboniferous — about 17 of 26 occurrencesCarboniferousPermian — about 9 of 26 occurrencesPermian348–345 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences345–343 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences343–340 Mya — about 3 occurrences340–337 Mya — about 3 occurrences337–334 Mya — about 2 occurrences334–331 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences331–328 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences328–325 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences325–323 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences323–320 Mya — about 1 occurrence320–317 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences317–314 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences314–311 Mya — about 1 occurrence311–308 Mya — about 2 occurrences308–305 Mya — about 1 occurrence305–303 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences303–300 Mya — about 1 occurrence300–297 Mya — about 1 occurrence297–294 Mya — about 2 occurrences294–291 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences291–288 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences288–285 Mya — about 1 occurrence285–283 Mya — about 1 occurrence283–280 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences280–277 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences277–274 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences268–265 Mya — about 1 occurrence265–263 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences335.4 Mya266.9 Mya348 Mya263 Mya

26 occurrences of Amaurotoma on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

26 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

16 formations

Salem — 38.60°N, 86.02°WSalem — 39.19°N, 86.57°WSalem — 38.88°N, 90.18°WSalem — 38.24°N, 85.98°WShakhtau Reef — 53.65°N, 56.09°EBird Spring — 36.60°N, 114.79°WBird Spring — 36.50°N, 115.58°WMojon de Hierro — 43.72°S, 70.68°WMojon de Hierro — 43.74°S, 69.88°WSalem Limestone — 37.31°N, 85.44°WRedoak Hollow — 34.37°N, 97.34°WFlechado — 36.41°N, 105.57°WColina — 31.25°N, 110.49°WPawnee — 38.64°N, 90.32°WAppanoose — 38.70°N, 90.39°WHolder — 33.40°N, 105.87°WGrindstone Creek — 32.71°N, 98.08°WTak Fa — 15.32°N, 100.43°EMorridge — 53.13°N, 2.20°WRat Buri — 13.53°N, 99.70°EMiller Creek and Wentworth Station — 45.02°N, 64.06°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Amaurotoma has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Amaurotoma and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Amaurotoma and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

789 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 24 sites for Amaurotoma, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

19 references

Each of the 26 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 7 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Amaurotoma was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Amaurotoma, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Amaurotoma was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Knight 1945