Amaurotoma subangulatum

No picture of Amaurotoma subangulatum was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Amaurotoma subangulatum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AmaurotomaPBDB
Diet
detritivorePBDB, for Microdomatidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Microdomatidae
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Euomphaloidea
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At most 17 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 346.7 Mya and 330.3 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Carboniferous — about 3 of 3 occurrencesCarboniferous347–347 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences347–346 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences346–345 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences345–345 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences345–344 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences344–344 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences344–343 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences343–343 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences343–342 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences342–341 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences341–341 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences341–340 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences340–340 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences340–339 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences339–339 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences339–338 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences338–337 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences337–337 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences337–336 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences336–336 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences336–335 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences335–334 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences334–334 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences334–333 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences333–333 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences333–332 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences332–332 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences332–331 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences331–330 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences330–330 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences347.2 Mya329.8 Mya

3 occurrences of Amaurotoma subangulatum on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Salem — 38.60°N, 86.02°WSalem — 38.24°N, 85.98°WMiller Creek and Wentworth Station — 45.02°N, 64.06°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Amaurotoma subangulatum has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Amaurotoma subangulatum and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Amaurotoma subangulatum and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

126 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Amaurotoma subangulatum, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Amaurotoma subangulatum was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Amaurotoma subangulatum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Amaurotoma subangulatum was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itAmaurotoma through timeFormations of the CarboniferousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Hall 1856)