Ambocoelia urii

No picture of Ambocoelia urii was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ambocoelia urii, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AmbocoeliaPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Ambocoelioidea
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Ambocoelioidea
Motility
stationary, attachedPBDB, for Ambocoelioidea
Vision
blindPBDB, for Rhynchonellata
Environment
marinePBDB, for Lophophorata

Time the record covers

At least 59 million years on record.

The record covers at least 358.86 Mya to 298.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 372.15 Mya to 290.1 Mya.

Devonian — about 1 of 2 occurrencesDevonianCarboniferous — about 0 of 2 occurrencesPermian — about 1 of 2 occurrencesPermian374–371 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences371–368 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences368–365 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences365–362 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences362–360 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences360–357 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences300–297 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences297–294 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences294–291 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences291–288 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences358.86 Mya298.9 Mya374 Mya288 Mya

2 occurrences of Ambocoelia urii on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Stourscombe — 50.50°N, 4.30°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ambocoelia urii has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Found in the same rock

90 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Ambocoelia urii, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ambocoelia urii was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ambocoelia urii, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Ambocoelia urii was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itAmbocoelia through timeThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Fleming 1823)