Biantholithus
Searched as Biantholithus sparsus. The Paleobiology Database treats Biantholithus as the accepted name.
No picture of Biantholithus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Biantholithus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CoccolithophyceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Haptophyta
- Life habit
- planktonic, depth=surfacePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Motility
- passively mobilePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Environment
- oceanic,oligotrophic,marine,brackishPBDB, for Haptophyta
Time the record covers
At least 10 million years on record.
The record covers at least 66 Mya to 56 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 72.2 Mya to 33.9 Mya.
20 occurrences of Biantholithus on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
20 occurrences- Late Cretaceous5%
- Paleocene70%
- Eocene25%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Biantholithus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 15 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Biantholithus and its relatives
PaleoceneWhere Biantholithus and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.
Found in the same rock
60 taxa- Chiasmolithus8 sites
- Discoaster6 sites
- Cruciplacolithus5 sites
- Dinoflagellata5 sites
- Markalius inversus4 sites
- Zygrhablithus bijugatus4 sites
- Coccolithus pelagicus3 sites
- Cyclagelosphaera reinhardtii3 sites
- Markalius3 sites
- Tribrachiatus3 sites
- Braarudosphaera bigelowii2 sites
- Clausicoccus2 sites
- Ellipsolithus2 sites
- Ericsonia2 sites
- Lapideacassis2 sites
- Prinsius2 sites
- Zeugrhabdotus sigmoides2 sites
- Aphrodina1 site
- Biscutum1 site
- Campylosphaera1 site
- Chlamys1 site
- Ctenocheles1 site
- Diplodetus nutrix1 site
- Eucalliax burckhardti1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 17 sites for Biantholithus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
7 references- Site U15148
- Site U14035
- A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in the Neuquén Basin of Argentina3
- Site U14801
- Site U14091
- Paleogene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy for two boreholes in the eastern Austral Basin, Patagonia, Argentina1
- Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Jaguel and Roca Formations (Maastrichtian-Danian) of the Neuquen Basin, Argentina1
Each of the 20 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Biantholithus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Biantholithus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Biantholithus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCoccolithophyceae through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Bramlette and Martini 1964