Chlamys sanguinolenta
No picture of Chlamys sanguinolenta was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys sanguinolenta, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ChlamysPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Chlamys
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Chlamys
- Motility
- stationary, attachedPBDB, for Chlamys
- Vision
- limitedPBDB, for Pectinidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Pectinida
Time the record covers
At most 2.6 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 2.58 Mya and 0 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
8 occurrences of Chlamys sanguinolenta on record, most of them in the Pleistocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
8 occurrences- Pleistocene100%
- Holoceneunder 1%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Chlamys sanguinolenta has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 3 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Chlamys sanguinolenta and its relatives
PleistoceneWhere Chlamys sanguinolenta and its relatives were recorded in the Pleistocene.
Found in the same rock
287 taxa- Codakia tigerina6 sites
- Anadara (Anadara) antiquata5 sites
- Lopha cristagalli5 sites
- Barbatia (Barbatia) lacerata4 sites
- Barbatia (Ustularca) fusca4 sites
- Conus4 sites
- Conus arenatus4 sites
- Mimachlamys senatoria4 sites
- Periglypta reticulata4 sites
- Spondylus4 sites
- Strombus (Gibberulus) gibberulus4 sites
- Tibia4 sites
- Acar plicata3 sites
- Arca3 sites
- Cardita variegata3 sites
- Cerithium3 sites
- Erosaria turdus3 sites
- Glycymeris pectunculus3 sites
- Hyotissa hyotis3 sites
- Lima lima3 sites
- Lyncina carneola3 sites
- Mitra3 sites
- Naria erosa3 sites
- Nassarius (Nassarius) arcularia3 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Chlamys sanguinolenta, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- The geology of the Farsan Islands, Oizan and Kamaran Island, Red Sea. Part 2.- Molluscan palaeontology.5
- Molluschi delle spiagge emerse del Mar Rosso e dell'Oceano Indiano, parte II (Lamellibranchi) [Mollusks from raised beaches bordering the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, part II (bivalves)]2
- Mollusques Pleistocenes de la Cote Francaise des Somalis [Pleistocene molluscs from French Somaliland]1
Each of the 8 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Chlamys sanguinolenta was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys sanguinolenta, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Chlamys sanguinolenta was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itChlamys through timeFormations of the PleistoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Gmelin 1791)