Cristatosaccus margitatus

No picture of Cristatosaccus margitatus was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Cristatosaccus margitatus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 11 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 251.902 Mya and 241.464 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Permian — about 0 of 9 occurrencesEarly Triassic — about 1 of 9 occurrencesEarly TriassicMiddle Triassic — about 8 of 9 occurrencesMiddle Triassic252–252 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences252–251 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences251–250 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences250–250 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences250–250 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences250–249 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences249–249 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences249–249 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences249–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences247–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences247–247 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences247–246 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences246–246 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences246–246 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences246–245 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences245–245 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences245–244 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences244–244 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences244–244 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences244–243 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences243–243 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences243–242 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences242–242 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences242–242 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences242–241 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences252.4 Mya241 Mya

9 occurrences of Cristatosaccus margitatus on record, most of them in the Middle Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

9 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Gevanim — 31.67°N, 34.83°ESaharonim — 31.67°N, 34.83°EZafir — 31.60°N, 34.70°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Cristatosaccus margitatus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Cristatosaccus margitatus and its relatives

Middle Triassic

Where Cristatosaccus margitatus and its relatives were recorded in the Middle Triassic.

Found in the same rock

31 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 9 sites for Cristatosaccus margitatus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 9 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Cristatosaccus margitatus was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Cristatosaccus margitatus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Cristatosaccus margitatus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.