Domatoceras latum

No picture of Domatoceras latum was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Domatoceras latum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
DomatocerasPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Nautilida
Life habit
nektobenthicPBDB, for Nautilida
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Nautilida
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
Environment
marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda

Time the record covers

At most 13 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 339.9 Mya and 326.9 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Carboniferous — about 2 of 2 occurrencesCarboniferous340–339 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences339–339 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences339–339 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences339–338 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences338–338 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences338–337 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences337–337 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences337–336 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences336–336 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences336–335 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences335–335 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences335–334 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences334–334 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences334–333 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences333–333 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences333–332 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences332–332 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences332–332 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences332–331 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences331–331 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences331–330 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences330–330 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences330–329 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences329–329 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences329–328 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences328–328 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences328–327 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences327–327 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences340.4 Mya326.4 Mya

2 occurrences of Domatoceras latum on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Steshev — 54.88°N, 37.44°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Domatoceras latum has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Domatoceras latum and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Domatoceras latum and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

10 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Domatoceras latum, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Domatoceras latum was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Domatoceras latum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Domatoceras latum was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Shimanskiy 1967