Eoobolus elatus

No picture of Eoobolus elatus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Eoobolus elatus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
EoobolusPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Eoobolus
Life habit
infaunalPBDB, for Linguloidea
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Eoobolus
Vision
blindPBDB, for Lingulata
Environment
marinePBDB, for Lophophorata

Time the record covers

At most 7.8 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 516 Mya and 508.2 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Cambrian — about 1 of 1 occurrenceCambrian516–516 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences516–516 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences516–515 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences515–515 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences515–515 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences515–514 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences514–514 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences514–514 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences514–514 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences514–513 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences513–513 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences513–513 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences513–512 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences512–512 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences512–512 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences512–512 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences512–511 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences511–511 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences511–511 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences511–510 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences510–510 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences510–510 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences510–509 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences509–509 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences509–509 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences509–509 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences509–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences516.5 Mya507.7 Mya

1 occurrence of Eoobolus elatus on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Cape Melville — 62.03°S, 57.60°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Eoobolus elatus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Eoobolus elatus and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Eoobolus elatus and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

4 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Eoobolus elatus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Eoobolus elatus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Eoobolus elatus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Eoobolus elatus was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Gravestock et al. 2001)