Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus

No picture of Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
GinkgocycadophytusPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 64 million years on record.

The record covers at least 174.7 Mya to 110.1 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 201.4 Mya to 93.9 Mya.

Late Triassic — about 0 of 15 occurrencesEarly Jurassic — about 1 of 15 occurrencesEarly JurassicMiddle Jurassic — about 0 of 15 occurrencesLate Jurassic — about 0 of 15 occurrencesLate JurassicEarly Cretaceous — about 12 of 15 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 1 of 15 occurrences204–200 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences200–196 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences196–192 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences192–189 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences189–185 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences185–181 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences181–177 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences177–174 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences163–159 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences159–155 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences155–151 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences151–148 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences148–144 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences144–140 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences140–136 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences136–133 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences133–129 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences129–125 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences125–122 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences122–118 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences118–114 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences114–110 Mya — about 2 occurrences110–107 Mya — about 4 occurrences107–103 Mya — about 4 occurrences103–99 Mya — about 3 occurrences99–95 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences95–92 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences174.7 Mya110.1 Mya204 Mya92 Mya

15 occurrences of Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

15 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Runnymede — 37.37°S, 140.90°ETambo — 27.34°S, 135.72°ETambo — 29.13°S, 140.88°ELathi — 26.86°N, 71.18°EBhuj — 23.60°N, 69.00°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 4 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus and its relatives

Early Cretaceous

Where Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

136 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

4 references

Each of the 15 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Ginkgocycadophytus nitidus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. de Jersey 1962