Hindeodus praeparvus

No picture of Hindeodus praeparvus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Hindeodus praeparvus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
HindeodusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Conodonta
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Conodonta
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Conodonta
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Conodonta

Time the record covers

At least 802 thousand years on record.

The record covers at least 251.902 Mya to 251.1 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 254.14 Mya to 250.8 Mya.

Permian — about 26 of 51 occurrencesPermianEarly Triassic — about 25 of 51 occurrencesEarly Triassic254–254 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences254–254 Mya — about 2 occurrences254–254 Mya — about 2 occurrences254–254 Mya — about 2 occurrences254–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–253 Mya — about 2 occurrences253–252 Mya — about 2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 4 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 4 occurrences252–251 Mya — about 4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences251.902 Mya251.1 Mya254.64 Mya250.3 Mya

51 occurrences of Hindeodus praeparvus on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

51 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

8 formations

Changxing — 30.17°N, 109.00°EDaye — 30.17°N, 109.00°EMajiaoling — 23.40°N, 106.00°ETalung — 23.70°N, 109.32°EWerfen — 46.57°N, 11.63°EWerfen — 46.29°N, 11.52°EHuangzhishan — 30.92°N, 119.99°EBellerophon Limestone — 46.57°N, 11.63°E"Bituminous Limestone" — 44.44°N, 19.53°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Hindeodus praeparvus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Found in the same rock

99 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 35 sites for Hindeodus praeparvus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

9 references

Each of the 51 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Hindeodus praeparvus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Hindeodus praeparvus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Kozur 1996