Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis
No picture of Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- Homalopoma umpquaensisPBDB
- Diet
- grazerPBDB, for Turbinidae
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Turbinidae
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Turbinidae
- Vision
- limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda
Time the record covers
At least 7 million years on record.
The record covers at least 48.07 Mya to 41.03 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 56 Mya to 37.71 Mya.
3 occurrences of Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
3 occurrences- Eocene100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis and its relatives
EoceneWhere Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
41 taxa- Aporolepas2 sites
- Brachidontes (Brachidontes) dichotomus2 sites
- Bryozoa2 sites
- Conus (Hemiconus) aegilops2 sites
- Cypraeogemmula warnerae2 sites
- Dendrophyllia tejonensis2 sites
- Dentalium2 sites
- Erginus vaderensis2 sites
- Eurete2 sites
- Flabellum clarki2 sites
- Glycymeris2 sites
- Homalopoma (Cantrainea)2 sites
- Isocrinidae2 sites
- Ostrea2 sites
- Polinices (Polinices) hornii2 sites
- Solariella (Solariella) garrardensis2 sites
- Aphrocallistes1 site
- Brachidontes (Brachidontes) cowlitzensis1 site
- Chama1 site
- Cidarina1 site
- Craniscus1 site
- Crassatella uvasana1 site
- Cylichnina tantilla1 site
- Emarginula dotyhillsensis1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
2 references- New Species of Middle Eocene Gastropods from the Northern Doty Hills, Southwestern Washington2
- Molluscan faunas of the Domengine and Arroyo Hondo Formations of the California Eocene1
Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Homalopoma umpquaensis domenginensis was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itHomalopoma umpquaensis through timeFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Vokes 1939