Lithocampe

No picture of Lithocampe was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithocampe, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
LithocampidaPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 122 million years on record.

The record covers at least 184.2 Mya to 61.66 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 192.9 Mya to 59.24 Mya.

Early Jurassic — about 2 of 54 occurrencesEarly JurassicMiddle Jurassic — about 0 of 54 occurrencesLate Jurassic — about 1 of 54 occurrencesLate JurassicEarly Cretaceous — about 1 of 54 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 17 of 54 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 33 of 54 occurrences196–191 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences191–186 Mya — about 1 occurrence186–182 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences149–145 Mya — about 1 occurrence145–140 Mya — about 1 occurrence89–84 Mya — about 3 occurrences84–80 Mya — about 3 occurrences80–75 Mya — about 1 occurrence75–70 Mya — about 3 occurrences70–66 Mya — about 8 occurrences66–61 Mya — about 30 occurrences61–57 Mya — about 2 occurrences184.2 Mya61.66 Mya196 Mya57 Mya

54 occurrences of Lithocampe on record, most of them in the Paleocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

54 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

5 formations

Mead Hill — 41.92°S, 174.07°ERyujin — 33.90°N, 135.23°ERyujin — 33.92°N, 135.27°EKirsanovskaya — 52.55°N, 42.57°EAmeghino — 64.47°S, 58.97°WSolan — 49.38°N, 18.39°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Lithocampe has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 18 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Lithocampe and its relatives

Paleocene

Where Lithocampe and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.

Found in the same rock

294 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 46 sites for Lithocampe, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

8 references

Each of the 54 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Lithocampe was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithocampe, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Lithocampe was found in Smithsonian Open Access and Sketchfab.

MorphoSource was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Ehrenberg 1839