Micula
No picture of Micula was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Micula itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Micula, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Also called
- coccolithophorePBDB
- Sits inside
- PolycyclolithaceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Haptophyta
- Life habit
- planktonic, depth=surfacePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Motility
- passively mobilePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Environment
- oceanic,oligotrophic,marine,brackishPBDB, for Haptophyta
Time the record covers
At least 357 million years on record.
The record covers at least 419.62 Mya to 61.66 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 443.1 Mya to 0 Mya.
266 occurrences of Micula on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
266 occurrences- Silurian2%
- Early Cretaceousunder 1%
- Late Cretaceous87%
- Paleocene11%
- Eoceneunder 1%
- Oligoceneunder 1%
- Mioceneunder 1%
- Plioceneunder 1%
- Pleistoceneunder 1%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
20 formations
- Jagüel Formation · Malargüe Group54
- Pedro Luro Formation21
- Corsicana Formation14
- Pedro Luro Formation8
- Campo Bola Formation7
- La Colonia Formation6
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Micula has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 133 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Micula and its relatives
Late CretaceousWhere Micula and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
689 taxa- Arkhangelskiella cymbiformis69 sites
- Eiffellithus turriseiffelii62 sites
- Kamptnerius magnificus61 sites
- Ahmuellerella octoradiata53 sites
- Prediscosphaera cretacea44 sites
- Watznaueria barnesiae42 sites
- Cribrosphaerella ehrenbergii35 sites
- Gartnerago obliquum32 sites
- Repagulum parvidentatum29 sites
- Gartnerago segmentatum27 sites
- Markalius inversus27 sites
- Tranolithus orionatus27 sites
- Eiffellithus eximius26 sites
- Marthasterites furcatus26 sites
- Reinhardtites anthophorus26 sites
- Prediscosphaera spinosa25 sites
- Cribrosphaerella daniae24 sites
- Prediscosphaera stoveri23 sites
- Eiffellithus22 sites
- Eiffellithus gorkae22 sites
- Nephrolithus frequens21 sites
- Broinsonia signata20 sites
- Chiastozygus litterarius19 sites
- Helicolithus trabeculatus19 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 145 sites for Micula, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
34 references- Site U151244
- End-Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton and response to the K/Pg event in the Kawas epicontinental sea. Insights from Cerro Bombero section, Jagüel formation, Neuquén Basin37
- Site U140323
- Nanofósiles calcáreos del Cretácico tardío - Terciario, del Pozo BB III A x-1 (Bahía Blanca), cuenca del Colorado, Argentina19
- Site U151318
- A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in the Neuquén Basin of Argentina14
- Sedimentology and extinction patterns across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary interval in East Texas14
- Site U151413
- Calcareous nannofossil events in the late cretaceous at Pedro Luro borehole, Colorado basin, Argentina11
- Site U134811
- Site U144310
- Site U14809
Each of the 266 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 22 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Micula was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Micula itself, so it was not used.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Micula, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Micula was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itPolycyclolithaceae through timeFormations of the Late CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Vekshina 1959