Mirapelia buarquianum

No picture of Mirapelia buarquianum was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Mirapelia buarquianum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
MirapeliaPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Ammonoidea
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Ammonoidea
Motility
fast-movingPBDB, for Ammonoidea
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
Environment
marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda

Time the record covers

At most 9.6 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 110.1 Mya and 100.5 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Early Cretaceous — about 6 of 6 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 0 of 6 occurrences110–110 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences110–110 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences110–109 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences109–109 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences109–108 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences108–108 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences108–108 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences108–107 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences107–107 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences107–107 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences107–106 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences106–106 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences106–106 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences106–105 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences105–105 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences105–105 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences105–104 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences104–104 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences104–104 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences104–103 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences103–103 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences103–102 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences102–102 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences102–102 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences102–101 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences101–101 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences101–101 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences101–100 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences110.6 Mya100 Mya

6 occurrences of Mirapelia buarquianum on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

6 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Riacheulo — 10.76°S, 37.08°WPariatambo — 9.37°S, 77.58°WGarschella — 47.33°N, 9.54°ECuio — 12.92°S, 13.07°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Mirapelia buarquianum has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Mirapelia buarquianum and its relatives

Early Cretaceous

Where Mirapelia buarquianum and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

82 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Mirapelia buarquianum, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

4 references

Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Mirapelia buarquianum was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Mirapelia buarquianum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Mirapelia buarquianum was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itMirapelia through timeFormations of the Early CretaceousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (White 1887)