Namurotypus sippeli

No picture of Namurotypus sippeli was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Namurotypus sippeli itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Namurotypus sippeli, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
NamurotypusPBDB
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Arthropoda
Environment
terrestrialPBDB, for Insecta

Time the record covers

At most 1.3 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 321.3 Mya and 320 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Carboniferous — about 2 of 2 occurrencesCarboniferous321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences320–320 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321.8 Mya319.5 Mya

2 occurrences of Namurotypus sippeli on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Namurotypus sippeli and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Namurotypus sippeli and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

15 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Namurotypus sippeli, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Namurotypus sippeli was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Namurotypus sippeli itself, so it was not used.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Namurotypus sippeli, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Namurotypus sippeli was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itNamurotypus through timeFormations of the CarboniferousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Brauckmann and Zessin 1989