Neocrepidolithus dirimosus
No picture of Neocrepidolithus dirimosus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Neocrepidolithus dirimosus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- NeocrepidolithusPBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Haptophyta
- Life habit
- planktonic, depth=surfacePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Motility
- passively mobilePBDB, for Haptophyta
- Environment
- oceanic,oligotrophic,marine,brackishPBDB, for Haptophyta
Time the record covers
At most 4.4 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 66 Mya and 61.66 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
3 occurrences of Neocrepidolithus dirimosus on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
3 occurrences- Paleocene100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Neocrepidolithus dirimosus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Neocrepidolithus dirimosus and its relatives
PaleoceneWhere Neocrepidolithus dirimosus and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.
Found in the same rock
42 taxa- Markalius inversus3 sites
- Cruciplacolithus2 sites
- Cruciplacolithus primus2 sites
- Cruciplacolithus tenuis2 sites
- Micula staurophora2 sites
- Placozygus sigmoides2 sites
- Arkhangelskiella cymbiformis1 site
- Biantholithus1 site
- Biscutum melaniae1 site
- Braarudosphaera bigelowi1 site
- Braarudosphaera bigelowii1 site
- Carpatella cornuta1 site
- Cervisiella1 site
- Chiasmolithus danicus1 site
- Coccolithus pelagicus1 site
- Cordosphaeridium1 site
- Cyclagelosphaera reinhardtii1 site
- Danea califonica1 site
- Dinoflagellata1 site
- Hafniasphaera1 site
- Hornibrookina edwardsii1 site
- Hornibrookina teuriensis1 site
- Hornibrookina weimerae1 site
- Lanternithus duocavus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Neocrepidolithus dirimosus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Primera ingresión atlántica en Peninsula de Valdés: Bioestratigrafía, paleoambiente y paleoclima del Daniano1
- Calcareous nannofossil events in the late cretaceous at Pedro Luro borehole, Colorado basin, Argentina1
- Site U14031
Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Neocrepidolithus dirimosus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Neocrepidolithus dirimosus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Neocrepidolithus dirimosus was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itNeocrepidolithus through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Perch-Nielsen 1979)