Oistodus orientalis

No picture of Oistodus orientalis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Oistodus orientalis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
OistodusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Conodonta
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Conodonta
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Conodonta
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Conodonta

Time the record covers

At most 2.9 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 461.1 Mya and 458.2 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Ordovician — about 1 of 1 occurrenceOrdovician461–461 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461–461 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461–461 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461–461 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461–461 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences460–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–459 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459–458 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences458–458 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences458–458 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences458–458 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences461.6 Mya457.7 Mya

1 occurrence of Oistodus orientalis on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Lower Setul Limestone — 6.42°N, 99.87°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Oistodus orientalis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Oistodus orientalis and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Oistodus orientalis and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

The Paleobiology Database records no fossil sites for Oistodus orientalis, so there is nothing to compare it with.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Oistodus orientalis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Oistodus orientalis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Oistodus orientalis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itOistodus through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Igo and Koike 1967