Orthakrolophos
No picture of Orthakrolophos was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Orthakrolophos, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ChasmocarcininaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Decapoda
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Decapoda
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Malacostraca
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Malacostraca
Time the record covers
At least 26 million years on record.
The record covers at least 37.71 Mya to 11.63 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 66 Mya to 5.333 Mya.
5 occurrences of Orthakrolophos on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
4 formations
- Miri Formation · Belait Group1
- Sandakan Formation1
- Barton Clay Formation1
- Becton Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Orthakrolophos has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Orthakrolophos and its relatives
EoceneWhere Orthakrolophos and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
44 taxa- Branchioplax concinna2 sites
- Palaeograpsus depressus2 sites
- Philyra granulosa2 sites
- Portunites subovata2 sites
- Calappa1 site
- Calappilia scopuli1 site
- Cyclocorystes pulchellus1 site
- Cyclocorystes vulgatus1 site
- Galene stipata1 site
- Glyphithyreus wetherelli1 site
- Goniochele1 site
- Harpactoxanthopsis lutugini1 site
- Heikeopsis tuberculata1 site
- Hoploparia1 site
- Hyastenus1 site
- Iphiculus sexspinosus1 site
- Leucosia serenei1 site
- Linuparus scyllariformis1 site
- Loerenthopluma danielae1 site
- Montezumella scabra1 site
- Myra subcarinata1 site
- Nucia platyspinosa1 site
- Paguridae1 site
- Pariphiculus decemtuberculatus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Orthakrolophos, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
4 references- New Eocene crabs from the Hampshire Basin2
- Loerenthopluma danielae, A new crab (Decapoda, Brachyura, Retroplumidae) from the Lower Eocene of Northwest Belgium1
- Miocene and Pleistocene Crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda) from Sabah and Sarawak1
- Neogene crabs from Brunei, Sabah, and Sarawak1
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Orthakrolophos was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Orthakrolophos, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Orthakrolophos was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itChasmocarcininae through timeFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Schweitzer and Feldmann 2001