Osmolskabole neptis
No picture of Osmolskabole neptis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Osmolskabole neptis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- OsmolskabolePBDB
- Diet
- deposit feederPBDB, for Proetida
- Life habit
- low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Trilobita
- Motility
- fast-movingPBDB, for Trilobita
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Phillipsiidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Trilobita
Time the record covers
At least 3.3 million years on record.
The record covers at least 368.5 Mya to 365.2 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 372.15 Mya to 358.86 Mya.
4 occurrences of Osmolskabole neptis on record, most of them in the Devonian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
4 occurrences- Devonian100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Osmolskabole neptis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Osmolskabole neptis and its relatives
DevonianWhere Osmolskabole neptis and its relatives were recorded in the Devonian.
Found in the same rock
4 taxa- Dianops2 sites
- Phacops tafilaltensis2 sites
- Protoxyclymenia dunkeri2 sites
- Phacops granulatus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Osmolskabole neptis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Ontogeny of a new cyrtosymboline trilobite from the Famennian of Morocco2
- The trilobite Osmolskabole from the Famennian of the Moravian Karst (Czech Republic): implications for the origin and descendance of the Cyrtosymbolinae1
- Famennian and Lower Carboniferous Cyrtosymbolinae (Trilobita) from the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland1
Each of the 4 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Osmolskabole neptis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Osmolskabole neptis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Osmolskabole neptis was found in Smithsonian Open Access and Sketchfab.
MorphoSource was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itOsmolskabole through timeFormations of the DevonianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Chlupáč 1961)