Palaeonarica guangxinensis

No picture of Palaeonarica guangxinensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Palaeonarica guangxinensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
PalaeonaricaPBDB
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Gastropoda
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Gastropoda
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At most 802 thousand years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 251.902 Mya and 251.1 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Permian — about 0 of 3 occurrencesEarly Triassic — about 3 of 3 occurrencesEarly Triassic252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252.4 Mya250.6 Mya

3 occurrences of Palaeonarica guangxinensis on record, most of them in the Early Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Al Jil — 23.12°N, 58.35°ELuolou — 24.96°N, 106.65°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Palaeonarica guangxinensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Palaeonarica guangxinensis and its relatives

Early Triassic

Where Palaeonarica guangxinensis and its relatives were recorded in the Early Triassic.

Found in the same rock

30 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Palaeonarica guangxinensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Palaeonarica guangxinensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Palaeonarica guangxinensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Palaeonarica guangxinensis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itPalaeonarica through timeFormations of the Early TriassicThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Kaim and Nützel 2010