Perisaccus sp.

No picture of Perisaccus sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Perisaccus sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 47 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 298.9 Mya and 251.902 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Carboniferous — about 0 of 82 occurrencesPermian — about 82 of 82 occurrencesPermianEarly Triassic — about 0 of 82 occurrences300–298 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences298–297 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences297–295 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences295–293 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences293–292 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences292–290 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences290–288 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences288–287 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences287–285 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences285–284 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences284–282 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences282–280 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences280–279 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences279–277 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences277–275 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences275–274 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences274–272 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences272–271 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences271–269 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences269–267 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences267–266 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences266–264 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences264–262 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences262–261 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences261–259 Mya — about 7 occurrences259–257 Mya — about 15 occurrences257–256 Mya — about 15 occurrences256–254 Mya — about 15 occurrences254–253 Mya — about 19 occurrences253–251 Mya — about 8 occurrences299.8 Mya251 Mya

82 occurrences of Perisaccus sp. on record, most of them in the Permian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

82 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

15 formations

Zechstein Limestone — 50.83°N, 20.67°EKingscourt Gypsum — 53.90°N, 6.79°WUpper Anhydrite — 50.83°N, 20.67°ETerrigenious Series — 50.83°N, 20.67°ETop Terrigenous Series — 50.83°N, 20.67°ELower Anhydrate — 50.83°N, 20.67°EPlaty Dolomite — 50.83°N, 20.67°EMain Anhydrite — 50.83°N, 20.67°ECopper Shale — 50.83°N, 20.67°EGrey Pelite — 50.83°N, 20.67°ETop Terrigenious Series — 50.83°N, 20.67°ELower Magnesium Limestone — 52.98°N, 1.27°WVal Gardena — 45.72°N, 11.18°EVal Gardena — 46.67°N, 11.15°ELower Anhydrate A1d — 50.83°N, 20.67°EVal Gardena Sandstone — 46.36°N, 11.41°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Perisaccus sp. has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 20 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Perisaccus sp. and its relatives

Permian

Where Perisaccus sp. and its relatives were recorded in the Permian.

Found in the same rock

144 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 63 sites for Perisaccus sp., and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

7 references

Each of the 82 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Perisaccus sp. was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Perisaccus sp. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Perisaccus sp. was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itFormations of the PermianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.