Retidiporites magdalenensis

No picture of Retidiporites magdalenensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Retidiporites magdalenensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RetidiporitesPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae

Time the record covers

At most 12 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 59.24 Mya and 48.07 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Paleocene — about 7 of 8 occurrencesPaleoceneEocene — about 1 of 8 occurrencesEocene59–59 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences59–59 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences59–58 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences58–58 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences58–57 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences57–57 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences57–56 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences56–56 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences56–56 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences56–55 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences55–55 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences55–54 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences54–54 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences54–54 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences54–53 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences53–53 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences53–52 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences52–52 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences52–52 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences52–51 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences51–51 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences51–50 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences50–50 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences50–50 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences50–49 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences49–49 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences49–48 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences48–48 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences59.7 Mya47.6 Mya

8 occurrences of Retidiporites magdalenensis on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

8 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Arcillas de el Limbo — 4.90°N, 73.02°WLos Cuervos — 4.90°N, 73.02°WLos Cuervos — 8.98°N, 73.00°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Retidiporites magdalenensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Retidiporites magdalenensis and its relatives

Paleocene

Where Retidiporites magdalenensis and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.

Found in the same rock

49 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Retidiporites magdalenensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 8 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Retidiporites magdalenensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Retidiporites magdalenensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itRetidiporites through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Van der Hammen and Garcia de Mutis 1966