Retusotriletes simplex

No picture of Retusotriletes simplex was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Retusotriletes simplex firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RetusotriletesPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 11 million years on record.

The record covers at least 393.47 Mya to 382.31 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 419.62 Mya to 372.15 Mya.

Silurian — about 0 of 4 occurrencesDevonian — about 4 of 4 occurrencesDevonian421–419 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences419–417 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences417–416 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences416–414 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences414–412 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences412–411 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences411–409 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences409–407 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences407–406 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences406–404 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences404–402 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences402–401 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences401–399 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences399–398 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences398–396 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences396–394 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences394–393 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences389–388 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences388–386 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences386–384 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences384–383 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences383–381 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences381–379 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences379–378 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences378–376 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences376–374 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences374–373 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences373–371 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences393.47 Mya382.31 Mya420.6 Mya371.2 Mya

4 occurrences of Retusotriletes simplex on record, most of them in the Devonian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

4 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Beartooth Butte — 44.87°N, 108.07°WBeartooth Butte — 44.95°N, 109.62°WEscuminac — 48.11°N, 66.40°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Retusotriletes simplex has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Retusotriletes simplex and its relatives

Devonian

Where Retusotriletes simplex and its relatives were recorded in the Devonian.

Found in the same rock

142 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Retusotriletes simplex, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 4 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Retusotriletes simplex was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Retusotriletes simplex firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Retusotriletes simplex was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Naumova 1953