Roxania chipolana

No picture of Roxania chipolana was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Roxania chipolana, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RoxaniaPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Haminoeoidea
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Haminoeoidea
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Haminoeoidea
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At least 4.3 million years on record.

The record covers at least 15.98 Mya to 11.63 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 20.45 Mya to 7.246 Mya.

Miocene — about 10 of 10 occurrencesMiocene20–20 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences20–20 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences20–19 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences19–19 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences19–18 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences18–18 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences18–17 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences17–17 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences17–16 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences16–16 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences12–11 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences11–11 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences11–11 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences11–10 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences10–9.6 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences9.6–9.1 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences9.1–8.6 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences8.6–8.2 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences8.2–7.7 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences7.7–7.2 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences15.98 Mya11.63 Mya20.9 Mya6.7 Mya

10 occurrences of Roxania chipolana on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

10 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Gatun — 9.34°N, 79.90°WGatun — 9.35°N, 79.83°WChipola — 30.44°N, 85.19°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Roxania chipolana has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Roxania chipolana and its relatives

Miocene

Where Roxania chipolana and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.

Found in the same rock

506 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 10 sites for Roxania chipolana, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 10 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Roxania chipolana was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Roxania chipolana, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Roxania chipolana was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itRoxania through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Dall 1895)