Rusophycus biloba

No picture of Rusophycus biloba was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Rusophycus biloba firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RusophycusPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 109 million years on record.

The record covers at least 468 Mya to 358.86 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 477.1 Mya to 346.7 Mya.

Ordovician — about 2 of 6 occurrencesOrdovicianSilurian — about 3 of 6 occurrencesSilurianDevonian — about 0 of 6 occurrencesCarboniferous — about 1 of 6 occurrencesCarboniferous480–475 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences475–471 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences471–466 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences453–448 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences448–444 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences435–430 Mya — about 3 occurrences362–358 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences358–353 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences353–349 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences349–344 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences468 Mya358.86 Mya480 Mya344 Mya

6 occurrences of Rusophycus biloba on record, most of them in the Silurian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

6 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Herkimer — 43.12°N, 75.60°WHerkimer — 43.04°N, 75.36°WHerkimer — 43.03°N, 75.28°WArnheim — 39.00°N, 84.00°WSnowy Plains — 37.01°S, 146.22°EGrebes Nest Point — 47.64°N, 52.98°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Rusophycus biloba has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Rusophycus biloba and its relatives

Silurian

Where Rusophycus biloba and its relatives were recorded in the Silurian.

Found in the same rock

167 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Rusophycus biloba, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

4 references

Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Rusophycus biloba was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Rusophycus biloba firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Rusophycus biloba was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itRusophycus through timeFormations of the SilurianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Vanuxem 1842