Saivodus
No picture of Saivodus was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Saivodus itself, so it was not used. Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Saivodus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CtenacanthiformesPBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Ctenacanthiformes
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Ctenacanthiformes
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Ctenacanthiformes
Time the record covers
At least 63 million years on record.
The record covers at least 346.7 Mya to 283.3 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 358.86 Mya to 274.4 Mya.
4 occurrences of Saivodus on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
4 occurrences- Carboniferous75%
- Permian25%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Saivodus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Saivodus and its relatives
CarboniferousWhere Saivodus and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.
Found in the same rock
54 taxa- Petalodus2 sites
- Acondylacanthus distans1 site
- Asterolepis verrucosa1 site
- Asteroptychius ornatus1 site
- Asteroptychius semiornatus1 site
- Carcharopsis wortheni1 site
- Chomatodus denticulatus1 site
- Chomatodus linearis1 site
- Chomatodus oliquus1 site
- Chomatodus truncatus1 site
- Cladodus marginatus1 site
- Cladodus mirabilis1 site
- Cladodus newmani1 site
- Coccosteus carbonarius1 site
- Cochliodus acutus1 site
- Cochliodus contortus1 site
- Ctenacanthus1 site
- Ctenacanthus elegans1 site
- Ctenoptychius apicalis1 site
- Ctenoptychius serratus1 site
- Deltodus sublaevis1 site
- Dipriacanthus stokesii1 site
- Erismacanthus jonesii1 site
- Eunemacanthus heterogyrus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Saivodus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Thurmond and Jones, 19812
- Ctenacanthiform sharks from the Permian Kaibab Formation, northern Arizona1
- A synopsis of the classification of the British Palaeozoic rocks, with a systematic description of the British Palaeozoic fossils.Fasciculus 3, Mollusca and Palaeozoic fishes1
Each of the 4 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
3D model
- Source
- Sketchfab
- Licence
- CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
- Commercial use
- the licence does not allow it
No picture of Saivodus was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Saivodus itself, so it was not used.
Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Saivodus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCtenacanthiformes through timeFormations of the CarboniferousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Duffin and Ginter 2006