Shamaraites
No picture of Shamaraites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Shamaraites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- FlemingitidaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Ceratitida
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda
Time the record covers
At most 2.5 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 251.1 Mya and 248.6 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
5 occurrences of Shamaraites on record, most of them in the Early Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrences- Early Triassic100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
4 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Shamaraites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Shamaraites and its relatives
Early TriassicWhere Shamaraites and its relatives were recorded in the Early Triassic.
Found in the same rock
49 taxa- Koninckites vetustus2 sites
- Palaeokazachstanites ussuriensis2 sites
- Pseudosageceras simplelobatum2 sites
- Radioceras timorense2 sites
- Radioceras truncatum2 sites
- Abrekites editus1 site
- Abrekites planus1 site
- Acrodus cuneocostatus1 site
- Anasibirites1 site
- Anaxenaspis1 site
- Arctoceras1 site
- Aspenites radiatus1 site
- Bakevellia1 site
- Brayardites1 site
- Churkites syaskoi1 site
- Clypeoceras1 site
- Clypites typicus1 site
- Ellisonia peculiaris1 site
- Eurygnathodus costatus1 site
- Euselachii1 site
- Glyptophiceras sinuatum1 site
- Hybodus1 site
- Inyoites1 site
- Juvenites1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Shamaraites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
5 references- High-resolution Early Triassic ammonoid biostratigraphy of South Tibet, China and implications for global correlations1
- Griesbachian and Dienerian (Early Triassic) ammonoids from the Salt Range, Pakistan1
- New Lower Triassic ammonoids from South Primorye1
- Smithian (Early Triassic) ammonoids from the Salt Range, Pakistan1
- The Lower Triassic System in the Abrek Bay area, south Primorye, Russia1
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Shamaraites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Shamaraites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Shamaraites was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFlemingitidae through timeFormations of the Early TriassicThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Shigeta and Zakharov 2009