Timoceras
No picture of Timoceras was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Timoceras, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- SibiritidaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Ceratitida
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda
Time the record covers
At most 3.8 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 250.8 Mya and 247 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
17 occurrences of Timoceras on record, most of them in the Early Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
17 occurrences- Early Triassic100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
- Pastanakhskaya/Ystannakhskaya Formation4
- Pastakh Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Timoceras has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 12 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Timoceras and its relatives
Early TriassicWhere Timoceras and its relatives were recorded in the Early Triassic.
Found in the same rock
38 taxa- Olenikites spiniplicatus11 sites
- Nordophiceras schmidti8 sites
- Phaedrysmocheilus subaratus7 sites
- Subolenekites altus7 sites
- Keyserlingites subrobustus6 sites
- Olenekoceras middendorffi6 sites
- Pseudosvalbardiceras sibiricum6 sites
- Boreomeekoceras keyserlingi5 sites
- Arctomeekoceras rotundatum4 sites
- Olenekoceras nikitini4 sites
- Nordophiceras karpinskii3 sites
- Olenekoceras schrenki3 sites
- Prosphingites czekanowskii3 sites
- Bajarunia euomphala2 sites
- Ceratites2 sites
- Mysidioptera2 sites
- Nordophiceras popovi2 sites
- Posidonia2 sites
- Sibirites eichwaldi2 sites
- Trematoceras elegans2 sites
- Anaxenaspis orientale1 site
- Bakevellia (Maizuria) varians1 site
- Beyrichites affinis1 site
- Czekanowskites decipiens1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 12 sites for Timoceras, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- Arktische Triasfaunen. Beiträge zur palaeontologischen Charakteristik der arktisch-pacifischen Triasprovinz6
- Examples of Late Olenekian invertebrate successions: Paper 2. Arctic Siberia (Mengilyakh Creek)4
- Boreal'nye Pozdneolenekskie Ammonoidei4
- Detailed biostratigraphy of Triassic deposits in the Lena lower reaches(northern Yakutia)1
- Dagis et al., 19961
- Zakharov, 19781
Each of the 17 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Timoceras was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Timoceras, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Timoceras was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itSibiritidae through timeFormations of the Early TriassicThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Dagis and Ermakova 1988