Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium

No picture of Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
WardiaphyllumPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 5.9 million years on record.

The record covers at least 63.4 Mya to 57.5 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 66 Mya to 56 Mya.

Late Cretaceous — about 0 of 2 occurrencesPaleocene — about 2 of 2 occurrencesPaleoceneEocene — about 0 of 2 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences66–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences58–57 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences57–57 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences57–57 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences57–56 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences56–56 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences63.4 Mya57.5 Mya66.5 Mya55.5 Mya

2 occurrences of Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Golden Valley — 46.88°N, 102.78°WFort Union — 46.35°N, 103.87°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium and its relatives

Paleocene

Where Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.

Found in the same rock

9 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Wardiaphyllum daturaefolium was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itWardiaphyllum through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hickey 1977