Acanthoidea indet.
No picture of Acanthoidea indet. was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Acanthoidea indet. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 94 million years on record.
The record covers at least 393.47 Mya to 298.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 419.62 Mya to 251.902 Mya.
4 occurrences of Acanthoidea indet. on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
4 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
- Garber Sandstone Formation · Sumner Group3
- Windmill Limestone Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Acanthoidea indet. has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Found in the same rock
16 taxa- Barbclabornia2 sites
- Orthacanthus texensis2 sites
- Pisces indet.2 sites
- Trimerorhachis2 sites
- Captorhinus aguti1 site
- Diplocaulus1 site
- Heterostraca indet.1 site
- Hybodontiformes1 site
- Nostolepis1 site
- Orthacanthus1 site
- Palaeoniscidea indet.1 site
- Palaeonisciformes1 site
- Placodermi indet.1 site
- Platysomus1 site
- Platysomus palmaris1 site
- Thelodonti1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Acanthoidea indet., and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
2 references- New Specimens of Xenacanth and Hybodont Sharks (Elasmobranchii: Xenacanthida and Hybodontoidea) from the Lower Permian of Southwestern Oklahoma3
- Early Devonian vertebrate microfossils from the Simpson Park Range, Eureka County, Nevada1
Each of the 4 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Acanthoidea indet. was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Acanthoidea indet. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Acanthoidea indet. was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.