Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus)
No picture of Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus), or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CalliostomaPBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Calliostoma
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Calliostoma
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Calliostoma
- Vision
- limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda
Time the record covers
At least 9.2 million years on record.
The record covers at least 23.04 Mya to 13.82 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 27.3 Mya to 5.333 Mya.
31 occurrences of Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
31 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 25 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) and its relatives
MioceneWhere Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
800 taxa- Venus (Ventricoloidea) multilamella26 sites
- Ringicula buccinea25 sites
- Astarte (Astarte) radiata24 sites
- Gemmula (Gemmula)24 sites
- Gouldia (Gouldia) minima24 sites
- Limopsis24 sites
- Limopsis (Limopsis) aurita24 sites
- Scapharca (Scapharca) diluvii24 sites
- Turritella24 sites
- Aporrhais (Aporrhais)23 sites
- Splendrillia23 sites
- Unedogemmula23 sites
- Varicorbula gibba23 sites
- Yoldia (Yoldia) glaberrima23 sites
- Babylonella22 sites
- Boreodrillia22 sites
- Conus (Conolithes)22 sites
- Cylichna (Cylichna)22 sites
- Fusiturris22 sites
- Inquisitor22 sites
- Lentigodentalium22 sites
- Parvicardium22 sites
- Pyrgolampros22 sites
- Saccella westendorpi22 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 28 sites for Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus), and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
7 references- Die Fauna des marinen Miozäns von Kevelaer (Niederrhein)24
- The mollusc fauna of the Stemerdink Bed (Miocene, Reinbekian) from outcrops in the Slinge brook at Winterswijk-Brinkheurne (The Netherlands, province of Gelderland)2
- Die molluskenfauna (Hermmorium, Untermiozän) aus der Kiesgrube kirnke bei Werder (Nordwest-Niedersachsen)1
- Computer-based mollusc stratigraphy - a case study from the Eggenburgian (Lower Miocene) type region (NE Austria)1
- Late Oligocene gastropods and bivalves from the Lower and Upper Austrian Molasse Basin1
- Lithofazielle Entwicklung und Molluskenfauna des oberen Badeniens (Miozän M4d) in dem Gebiet Bratislava-Devinska Nova Ves [Lithofacies and mollusc fauna of the Upper Badenian in the Bratislava-Devinska Nova Ves area]1
- Mollusc fauna of the Hungarian Upper Oligocene (Egerian)1
Each of the 31 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) itself, so it was not used.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus), or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Calliostoma (Ampullotrochus) was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCalliostoma through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Monterosato 1890)