Catacoeloceras crassum

No picture of Catacoeloceras crassum was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Catacoeloceras crassum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
CatacoelocerasPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Ammonoidea
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Ammonoidea
Motility
fast-movingPBDB, for Ammonoidea
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
Environment
marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda

Time the record covers

At most 8.2 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 182.9 Mya and 174.7 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Early Jurassic — about 27 of 27 occurrencesEarly JurassicMiddle Jurassic — about 0 of 27 occurrences183–183 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences183–182 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences182–182 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences182–182 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences182–182 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences182–181 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences181–181 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences181–181 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences181–180 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences180–180 Mya — about 1 occurrence180–180 Mya — about 1 occurrence180–179 Mya — about 1 occurrence179–179 Mya — about 1 occurrence179–179 Mya — about 1 occurrence179–178 Mya — about 1 occurrence178–178 Mya — about 1 occurrence178–178 Mya — about 1 occurrence178–178 Mya — about 1 occurrence178–177 Mya — about 1 occurrence177–177 Mya — about 1 occurrence177–177 Mya — about 1 occurrence177–176 Mya — about 1 occurrence176–176 Mya — about 1 occurrence176–176 Mya — about 1 occurrence176–175 Mya — about 1 occurrence175–175 Mya — about 1 occurrence175–175 Mya — about 1 occurrence175–175 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences183.4 Mya174.2 Mya

27 occurrences of Catacoeloceras crassum on record, most of them in the Early Jurassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

27 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Alum Shale — 54.49°N, 0.60°WAlum Shale — 54.40°N, 0.47°WKisgerecse — 47.66°N, 18.47°EOzirovo — 43.22°N, 23.39°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Catacoeloceras crassum has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 13 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Catacoeloceras crassum and its relatives

Early Jurassic

Where Catacoeloceras crassum and its relatives were recorded in the Early Jurassic.

Found in the same rock

61 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 27 sites for Catacoeloceras crassum, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

9 references

Each of the 27 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Licence
CC Attribution
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record

No picture of Catacoeloceras crassum was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Catacoeloceras crassum, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Young and Bird 1828)