Crataegus
No picture of Crataegus was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikipedia and Wikidata have a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Crataegus itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Crataegus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Also called
- hawthornPBDB
- Sits inside
- PomaceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae
Time the record covers
At least 53 million years on record.
The record covers at least 57.5 Mya to 3.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 60.9 Mya to 2.58 Mya.
90 occurrences of Crataegus on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
90 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
14 formations
- John Day Formation6
- Florissant Formation6
- Salmon City Formation5
- Middlegate Formation3
- Fort Union Formation2
- Ogawa Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Crataegus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 59 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Crataegus and its relatives
MioceneWhere Crataegus and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
463 taxa- Quercus13 sites
- Carya11 sites
- Chamaecyparis10 sites
- Pinus10 sites
- Salix10 sites
- Mahonia9 sites
- Prunus9 sites
- Acer8 sites
- Cedrela8 sites
- Rhus8 sites
- Ulmus8 sites
- Betula7 sites
- Cercocarpus7 sites
- Koelreuteria7 sites
- Robinia7 sites
- Typha lesquereuxi7 sites
- Abies6 sites
- Alnus6 sites
- Astronium6 sites
- Castanea6 sites
- Cedrelospermum6 sites
- Cercis parvifolia6 sites
- Cornus6 sites
- Fagopsis longifolia6 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 18 sites for Crataegus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
24 references- Die mittelmiozaenen und obermiozaenen Floren aus der Meuroer und Raunoer Folge in der Lausitz. III. Fundstellen und Palaeobiologie13
- Miocene floras in the lower Rhenish basin and their ecological interpretation13
- Fossil Plants of the Florissant Beds of Colorado10
- Allochthonous seed and fruit floras from the Pliocene of the Lower Rhine Basin8
- The Oligocene Bridge Creek flora of the John Day Formation, Oregon7
- Tretichnye Flory Zapadnoi Sibiri7
- The Oligocene Haynes Creek Flora of Eastern Idaho5
- A catalogue of Cenozoic megafossil plants in China4
- Miocenska Flora ze Starych Gliwic na Slasku (Miocene Flora of Stare Gliwice in Upper Silesia)4
- Miocene Floras From the Middlegate Basin, West-Central Nevada3
- Plant and mammal diversity in the Paleocene to Early Eocene of the Bighorn Basin2
- Die "Saugbaggerflora", eine Frucht- und Samenflora aus dem Grenzbereich Miozaen- Pliozaen von Sessenheim im Elsass (Frankreich)2
Each of the 90 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 12 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
No picture of Crataegus was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Wikidata have a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Crataegus itself, so it was not used.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Crataegus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itPomaceae through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Linnaeus 1753