Cryptolepis
No picture of Cryptolepis was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Cryptolepis itself, so it was not used. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Cryptolepis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- OsteolepiformesPBDB
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
Time the record covers
At most 14 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 372.15 Mya and 358.86 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
4 occurrences of Cryptolepis on record, most of them in the Devonian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
4 occurrences- Devonian100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
4 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Cryptolepis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Cryptolepis and its relatives
DevonianWhere Cryptolepis and its relatives were recorded in the Devonian.
Found in the same rock
56 taxa- Glyptolepis3 sites
- Holoptychius nobilissimus3 sites
- Bothriolepis ciecere2 sites
- Conchodus2 sites
- Devononchus tenuispinus2 sites
- Glyptopomus2 sites
- Moythomasia2 sites
- Orlovichthys limnatis2 sites
- Tuberospina2 sites
- ? Glyptopomus bystrowi1 site
- Acanthodes lopatini1 site
- Acanthodii1 site
- Acrolepis reticulata1 site
- Bothriolepis jani1 site
- Bothriolepis ornata1 site
- Bothriolepis siberica1 site
- Cheirolepididae1 site
- Chelyophorus1 site
- Chelyophorus verneuil1 site
- Chelyphorus verneuli1 site
- Chirodipterus interstitus1 site
- Conchodus excussus1 site
- Devononchus1 site
- Devononchus ketleriensis1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Cryptolepis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
4 references- Taphonomy of the vertebrate bone beds from the Klūnas fossil site, Upper Devonian Tērvete Formation of Latvia1
- End-Devonian extinction and a bottleneck in the early evolution of modern jawed vertebrates1
- Sedimentology, fauna, and taphonomy of the Pavâri site, Late Devonian of Latvia1
- Dipnoans from the Upper Devonian Locality Rybnitsa in Oryol Region1
Each of the 4 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
Photogrammetry
- Source
- MorphoSource
- Licence
- not stated by the source
- Commercial use
- cannot be read from the licence given — check the record
- Specimen
- Cryptolepis grossi · LDM:G:G 81-603
No picture of Cryptolepis was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Cryptolepis itself, so it was not used.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Cryptolepis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itOsteolepiformes through timeFormations of the DevonianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Vorobyeva 1975