Hanetia dalli

Hanetia dalli

via iDigBio · CC0 · via iDigBio. May be a photograph of a specimen, or an artist’s reconstruction — an interpretation of a skeleton, since colour and soft tissue are almost never preserved.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
HanetiaPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Buccinidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Buccinidae
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Buccinidae
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At least 8 million years on record.

The record covers at least 11.63 Mya to 3.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 15.98 Mya to 2.58 Mya.

Miocene — about 31 of 33 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 2 of 33 occurrencesPliocenePleistocene — about 0 of 33 occurrences16–16 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences16–15 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences15–15 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences15–14 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences14–14 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences14–13 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences13–13 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences13–12 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences12–12 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences12–11 Mya — about 3 occurrences11–11 Mya — about 3 occurrences11–10 Mya — about 3 occurrences10–9.8 Mya — about 3 occurrences9.8–9.3 Mya — about 3 occurrences9.3–8.8 Mya — about 3 occurrences8.8–8.3 Mya — about 3 occurrences8.3–7.8 Mya — about 3 occurrences7.8–7.4 Mya — about 3 occurrences7.4–6.9 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences6.9–6.4 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences6.4–5.9 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences5.9–5.4 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences5.4–5.0 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences5.0–4.5 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences4.5–4.0 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences4.0–3.5 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences3.5–3.0 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences3.0–2.6 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences11.63 Mya3.6 Mya16.5 Mya2.1 Mya

33 occurrences of Hanetia dalli on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

33 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

9 formations

Gatun — 9.35°N, 79.81°WGatun — 9.35°N, 79.82°WGatun — 9.27°N, 79.92°WTuira — 8.35°N, 78.07°WTuira — 8.20°N, 77.71°WAngostura — 1.09°N, 78.99°WPicaderos — 0.80°N, 78.93°WMunguidó — 4.43°N, 77.00°WLimónes — 10.00°N, 83.22°WTubará — 10.75°N, 75.00°WAgueguexquite — 18.14°N, 94.44°WCaujarao — 11.46°N, 69.32°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Hanetia dalli has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Hanetia dalli and its relatives

Miocene

Where Hanetia dalli and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.

Found in the same rock

317 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 13 sites for Hanetia dalli, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

10 references

Each of the 33 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

Picture of Hanetia dalli

Source
iDigBio
Credit
via iDigBio
Licence
CC0
Commercial use
the licence allows it

No 3D scan of Hanetia dalli was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Brown and Pilsbry 1911)