Reticulochlamys borjasensis
No picture of Reticulochlamys borjasensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Reticulochlamys borjasensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ReticulochlamysPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Pectinidae
- Life habit
- low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Pectinidae
- Motility
- facultatively mobilePBDB, for Pectinidae
- Vision
- limitedPBDB, for Pectinidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Pectinida
Time the record covers
At most 12 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 27.3 Mya and 15.98 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
2 occurrences of Reticulochlamys borjasensis on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
2 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Reticulochlamys borjasensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Reticulochlamys borjasensis and its relatives
MioceneWhere Reticulochlamys borjasensis and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
113 taxa- Jorgechlamys centralis2 sites
- Jorgechlamys juliana2 sites
- Peonza torquata2 sites
- ? Tricosirius patagonica1 site
- "Chione" patagonia1 site
- Ameghinomya argentina1 site
- Ameghinomya darwini1 site
- Ameghinomya meridionalis1 site
- Antimelatoma1 site
- Arca1 site
- Arca (Arca) patagonica1 site
- Ataxocerithium1 site
- Atrina magellanica1 site
- Aulacomya atra1 site
- Austroimbricaria1 site
- Austroimbricaria quemadensis1 site
- Austromitra1 site
- Borsonia1 site
- Calliostoma1 site
- Calyptraea1 site
- Calyptraea pileus1 site
- Cardium1 site
- Cardium pisum1 site
- Chione casa1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Reticulochlamys borjasensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
2 references- Tertiary Marine Molluscan Assemblages of Eastern Patagonia (Argentina): A Biostratigraphic Analysis1
- Revision of the large Neogene pectinids (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of eastern Santa Cruz and Chubut provinces (Patagonia: Argentina)1
Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Reticulochlamys borjasensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Reticulochlamys borjasensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Reticulochlamys borjasensis was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itReticulochlamys through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Del Río 2004