Saraikimasoom vitakri

No picture of Saraikimasoom vitakri was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Saraikimasoom vitakri, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
SaraikimasoomPBDB
Diet
herbivorePBDB, for Sauropoda
Life habit
ground dwelling, gregariousPBDB, for Sauropoda
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Sauropoda
Environment
terrestrialPBDB, for Sauropoda

Time the record covers

At most 6.2 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 72.2 Mya and 66 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Late Cretaceous — about 12 of 12 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 0 of 12 occurrences72–72 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences72–72 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences72–72 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences72–71 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences71–71 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences71–71 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences71–71 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences71–70 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences70–70 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences70–70 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences70–70 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences70–69 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences69–69 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences69–69 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences69–69 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences69–68 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences68–68 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences68–68 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences68–68 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences68–67 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences67–67 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences67–67 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences67–67 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences67–66 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences72.7 Mya65.5 Mya

12 occurrences of Saraikimasoom vitakri on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

12 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Vitakri — 29.68°N, 69.39°EVitakri — 29.71°N, 69.49°EVitakri — 29.77°N, 69.45°EVitakri — 27.76°N, 67.17°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Saraikimasoom vitakri has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Saraikimasoom vitakri and its relatives

Late Cretaceous

Where Saraikimasoom vitakri and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

19 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 12 sites for Saraikimasoom vitakri, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 12 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Saraikimasoom vitakri was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Saraikimasoom vitakri, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Saraikimasoom vitakri was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Malkani 2014