Strophomena sulcata
No picture of Strophomena sulcata was found. Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Strophomena sulcata itself, so it was not used. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Strophomena sulcata firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Time the record covers
At most 16 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 458.2 Mya and 443.1 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
13 occurrences of Strophomena sulcata on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
13 occurrences- Ordovician100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
- Big Hill Formation2
- Waynesville Formation · Richmondian Group2
- Stonington Formation1
- Whitewater Formation1
- Lower Whitewater Formation · Richmondian Group1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Strophomena sulcata has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 6 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Strophomena sulcata and its relatives
OrdovicianWhere Strophomena sulcata and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.
Found in the same rock
109 taxa- Hebertella occidentalis10 sites
- Hiscobeccus capax9 sites
- Platystrophia acutilirata9 sites
- Plaesiomys subquadratus8 sites
- Rafinesquina alternata7 sites
- Rhynchotrema dentatum7 sites
- Strophomena planumbona7 sites
- Strophomena vetusta7 sites
- Platystrophia clarksvillensis6 sites
- Platystrophia cypha6 sites
- Glyptorthis insculpta5 sites
- Vinlandostrophia annieana5 sites
- Zygospira modesta5 sites
- Eochonetes clarksvillensis4 sites
- Hebertella alveata4 sites
- Leptaena richmondensis4 sites
- Retrorsirostra carleyi4 sites
- Cincinnetina meeki3 sites
- Helicelasma rusticum3 sites
- Platystrophia3 sites
- Pterinea demissa3 sites
- Rafinesquina ponderosa3 sites
- Tetraphalerella neglecta3 sites
- Vinlandostrophia moritura3 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 13 sites for Strophomena sulcata, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- GIS-based biogeography of Cincinnatian (Upper Ordovician) brachiopods with special reference to Hebertella9
- The Richmond Formation of Michigan3
- The coral horizons and stratigraphy of the upper Richmond Group in Kentucky west of the Cincinnati Arch1
Each of the 13 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Strophomena sulcata was found. Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Strophomena sulcata itself, so it was not used.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Strophomena sulcata firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
No 3D scan of Strophomena sulcata was found in Smithsonian Open Access and Sketchfab.
MorphoSource was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hall and Clarke 1892