Tibetites
No picture of Tibetites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Tibetites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- TibetitidaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Ceratitida
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Ceratitida
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda
Time the record covers
At least 11 million years on record.
The record covers at least 227.3 Mya to 215.38 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 237 Mya to 201.4 Mya.
11 occurrences of Tibetites on record, most of them in the Late Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
11 occurrences- Late Triassic100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Tibetites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 7 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Tibetites and its relatives
Late TriassicWhere Tibetites and its relatives were recorded in the Late Triassic.
Found in the same rock
55 taxa- Acanthinites silverii1 site
- Acanthodrepanites eusebii1 site
- Alloclionites ares1 site
- Anatibetites magnus1 site
- Baoenites parvus1 site
- Bihaticrinus manipulus1 site
- Carinacanthites calypso1 site
- Catenohalorites malayicus1 site
- Cladiscites beyrichi1 site
- Clionites quinquespinatus1 site
- Cryptonerita conoidea1 site
- Cyrtopleurites bicrenatus1 site
- Cyrtopleurites euphrasiae1 site
- Cyrtopleurites hersiliae1 site
- Cyrtopleurites strabonis1 site
- Cyrtopleurites vestaliae1 site
- Daonella1 site
- Drepanites fissistriatus1 site
- Drepanites hyatti1 site
- Drepanites saturnini1 site
- Ectolcites sidoniae1 site
- Griesbachites hanni1 site
- Halobia comata1 site
- Halobia fascigera1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Tibetites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- Upper Triassic Cephalopoda faunae of the Himalaya4
- Late Triassic ammonites from Yunnan3
- The Triassic of Indochina Peninsula and its interregional correlation1
- Obertriassische Ammonoideen aus dem Zentralnepalesischen Himalaya (Gebiet von Jomsom) [Upper Triassic ammonoids from the central Nepalese Himalaya (Jomsom area)]1
- Ammonitenfauna und Stratigraphie im höheren Nor (Alaun, Trias) der Tethys aufgrund neuer Untersuchungen in Timor1
- Die Ceratitoidea der karnisch-norischen Mischfauna des Feuerkogels bei Aussee1
Each of the 11 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Tibetites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Tibetites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Tibetites was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itTibetitidae through timeFormations of the Late TriassicThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Mojsisovics 1896