Tomaculum
No picture of Tomaculum was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Tomaculum firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- AnimaliaPBDB
Time the record covers
At least 77 million years on record.
The record covers at least 538.8 Mya to 461 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 635 Mya to 459.7 Mya.
6 occurrences of Tomaculum on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
6 occurrences- Cambrian17%
- Ordovician67%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
- Wulongqing Formation1
- Xistenta Formation1
- La Bastida Shales Formation1
- Villar del Salz Formation1
- Floyd Church Formation · Albemarle Group1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Tomaculum has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Tomaculum and its relatives
OrdovicianWhere Tomaculum and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.
Found in the same rock
79 taxa- Planolites3 sites
- Didymograptus (Didymograptus) artus2 sites
- Redonia deshayesi2 sites
- Ribeiria pholadiformis2 sites
- ? Olenichnus sp.1 site
- Acrograptus1 site
- Aegiromena mariana1 site
- Anatifopsis1 site
- Aparchites1 site
- Apollonorthis bussacensis1 site
- Arachnostega gastrochaenae1 site
- Asaphidae1 site
- Babinka prima1 site
- Balanocystis sp.1 site
- Calix purkynei1 site
- Cardiolaria beirensis1 site
- Caryocrinites1 site
- Chondrites1 site
- Colaptomena1 site
- Colpocoryphe1 site
- Colpocoryphe rouaulti1 site
- Crozonorthis musculosa1 site
- Diplichnites1 site
- Diplograptina1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Tomaculum, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- A diverse ichnofauna from the Cambrian Stage 4 Wulongqing Formation near Kunming (Yunnan Province, South China)1
- Paleoenvironmental and paleobiogeographic implications of a new Ediacaran body fossil from the Neoproterozoic Carolina Terrane, Stanly County, North Carolina1
- The Ordovician succession from the western Iberian Ranges (NE Spain): a review with new data1
- Reappraisal of the Ordovician stratigraphy and paleontology of Trás-os-Montes (Central Iberian Zone, NE Portugal)1
- Graptolites from the Benton area of west-central New Brunswick and their regional significance1
- Bioestratigrafia de las pizarras ordovicicas en la Sierra de Tamames, Sinclinal de Sequeros-Ahigal de los Aceiteros, Provincia de Salamanca1
Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Tomaculum was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Tomaculum firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Tomaculum was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itAnimalia through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Groom 1902