Treptichnidae
No picture of Treptichnidae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Treptichnidae firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- IchnofossilsPBDB
Time the record covers
At most 97 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 635 Mya and 538.8 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
5 occurrences of Treptichnidae on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
- Urusis Formation · Nama Group3
- Nudaus Formation · Schwarzrand Group1
- Urusis Formation · Schwarzrand Group1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Treptichnidae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Found in the same rock
20 taxa- Helminthopsis5 sites
- Archaeonassa4 sites
- Bergaueria3 sites
- Conichnus3 sites
- Aspidella2 sites
- Ernietta plateauensis2 sites
- Gordia2 sites
- Helminthoidichnites2 sites
- Parapsammichnites2 sites
- Pteridinium simplex2 sites
- Torrowangea2 sites
- Archaeichnium haughtoni1 site
- Bergauria sp.1 site
- Cloudina hartmannae1 site
- Corumbella werneri1 site
- Namacalathus hermanastes1 site
- Rangea schneiderhoehni1 site
- Rangeomorpha1 site
- Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis1 site
- Swartpuntia germsi1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Treptichnidae, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
4 references- Supplemental Data for Ediacaran Diversification Rates2
- Pushing the boundary: A calibrated Ediacaran-Cambrian stratigraphic record from the Nama Group in northwestern Republic of South Africa1
- Paleontology and ichnology of the late Ediacaran Nasep–Huns transition (Nama Group, southern Namibia)1
- The trace fossil record of the Nama Group, Namibia: Exploring the terminal Ediacaran roots of the Cambrian explosion1
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Treptichnidae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Treptichnidae firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itIchnofossils through time
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Darroch et al. 2024