Atys obscuratus

No picture of Atys obscuratus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Atys obscuratus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AtysPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Haminoeidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Haminoeidae
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Haminoeidae
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Gastropoda

Time the record covers

At least 14 million years on record.

The record covers at least 15.98 Mya to 1.8 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 20.45 Mya to 774 ka.

Miocene — about 4 of 6 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 0 of 6 occurrencesPleistocene — about 2 of 6 occurrencesPleistocene21–20 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences20–20 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences20–19 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences19–18 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences18–18 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences18–17 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences17–16 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences16–15 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences3.0–2.3 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences2.3–1.7 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences1.7–963 ka Mya — about 1 occurrence963 ka–274 ka Mya — about 0.3 occurrences15.98 Mya1.8 Mya20.9 Mya274 ka

6 occurrences of Atys obscuratus on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

6 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Chipola — 30.44°N, 85.19°WChipola — 30.43°N, 84.98°WBermont — 26.89°N, 82.01°WCaloosahatchee — 27.77°N, 82.68°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Atys obscuratus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Atys obscuratus and its relatives

Miocene

Where Atys obscuratus and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.

Found in the same rock

671 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Atys obscuratus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Atys obscuratus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Atys obscuratus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Atys obscuratus was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itAtys through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Dall 1896)