Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria

No picture of Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AequipectenPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Aequipecten
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Aequipecten
Motility
facultatively mobilePBDB, for Aequipecten
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Pectinidae
Environment
marinePBDB, for Pectinida

Time the record covers

At least 13 million years on record.

The record covers at least 23.04 Mya to 9.4 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 27.3 Mya to 4.7 Mya.

Oligocene — about 1 of 2 occurrencesOligoceneMiocene — about 1 of 2 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 0 of 2 occurrences28–27 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences27–26 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences26–25 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences25–25 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences25–24 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences24–23 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences23–22 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences9.7–8.9 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences8.9–8.1 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences8.1–7.3 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences7.3–6.6 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences6.6–5.8 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences5.8–5.0 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences5.0–4.2 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences23.04 Mya9.4 Mya27.8 Mya4.2 Mya

2 occurrences of Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Citronelle — 31.57°N, 88.04°WChickasawhay — 31.72°N, 88.66°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Found in the same rock

22 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Chlamys (Aequipecten) chickaria was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itAequipecten through timeThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Mansfield 1940