Natemys

No picture of Natemys was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Natemys, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
UelociniPBDB
Diet
durophage, piscivorePBDB, for Dermochelyidae
Life habit
aquaticPBDB, for Dermochelyidae
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
Environment
marinePBDB, for Dermochelyidae

Time the record covers

At least 13 million years on record.

The record covers at least 27.3 Mya to 13.82 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 33.9 Mya to 7.246 Mya.

Eocene — about 0 of 5 occurrencesOligocene — about 4 of 5 occurrencesOligoceneMiocene — about 1 of 5 occurrencesMiocene34–34 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences34–33 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences33–32 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences32–31 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences31–30 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences30–29 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences29–28 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences28–27 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences27–26 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences26–25 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences25–24 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences24–23 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences23–22 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences14–13 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences13–12 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences12–11 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences11–10 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences10–9.5 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences9.5–8.6 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences8.6–7.6 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences7.6–6.7 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences27.3 Mya13.82 Mya34.4 Mya6.7 Mya

5 occurrences of Natemys on record, most of them in the Oligocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

5 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Chandler Bridge — 32.95°N, 80.11°WAshley — 32.89°N, 79.84°WPisco — 14.63°S, 75.63°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Natemys has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Natemys and its relatives

Oligocene

Where Natemys and its relatives were recorded in the Oligocene.

Found in the same rock

20 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Natemys, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Natemys was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Natemys, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Natemys was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itUelocini through timeFormations of the OligoceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Wood et al. 1996