Neoepiblemidae
The Neoepiblemidae are an extinct family of hystricognath rodents from South America. The genera Dabbenea and Perumys are now included in Phoberomys. The delineation between Neoepiblemidae and Dinomyidae has historically been unclear, with some genera having varying taxonomic placement. A 2017 study found Phoberomys to be part of the group, while Eusigmomys was found to be part of the Dinomyidae.
No picture of Neoepiblemidae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Neoepiblemidae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ChinchilloideaPBDB
- Diet
- herbivorePBDB, for Rodentia
- Life habit
- ground dwellingPBDB, for Rodentia
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
- Environment
- terrestrialPBDB, for Eutheria
Time the record covers
At least 13 million years on record.
The record covers at least 17.5 Mya to 3.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 21 Mya to 2.58 Mya.
129 occurrences of Neoepiblemidae on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
129 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
15 formations
- Santa Cruz Formation31
- Urumaco Formation19
- Solimoes Formation15
- Pinturas Formation13
- Ituzaingo Formation13
- Galera Formation8
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Neoepiblemidae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 4 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Neoepiblemidae and its relatives
MioceneWhere Neoepiblemidae and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
708 taxa- Neoreomys australis20 sites
- Perimys18 sites
- Acarechimys minutissimus13 sites
- Perimys erutus13 sites
- Acdestis oweni11 sites
- Adinotherium11 sites
- Palaeothentes minutus11 sites
- Stichomys11 sites
- Interatherium10 sites
- Branisamyopsis praesigmoides9 sites
- Hapalops9 sites
- Luantus propheticus9 sites
- Nesodon9 sites
- Perimys intermedius9 sites
- Phoberomys9 sites
- Proeutatus9 sites
- Propalaehoplophoridae9 sites
- Steiromys duplicatus9 sites
- Eosteiromys annectens8 sites
- Neoreomys8 sites
- Prostichomys bowni8 sites
- Protypotherium8 sites
- Protypotherium praerutilum8 sites
- Scleromys quadrangulatus8 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 57 sites for Neoepiblemidae, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
47 references- Revision of the Miocene caviomorph rodents from the Río Santa Cruz (Argentinean Patagonia)13
- Roedores chinchilloideos (Hystricognathi) de la Formación Pinturas, Mioceno temprano-medio de la provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina13
- Imigrantes em um continente perdido: O registro fossilífero de roedores Caviomorpha (Mammalia: Rodentia: Ctenohystrica) do Cenozoico do Brasil6
- Tropical fossil caviomorph rodents from the Southwestern Brazilian amazonia in the context of the South American faunas: systematics, biochronology and paleobiogeography6
- Giant rodents from the Neotropics: diversity and dental variation of late Miocene neoepiblemid remains from Urumaco, Venezuela6
- The fossil record of Phoberomys pattersoni Mones 1980 (Mammalia, Rodentia) from Urumaco (Late Miocene, Venezuela), with an analysis of its phylogenetic relationships6
- Bioestratigrafía de la Formación Santa Cruz (Mioceno Inferior) en el extremo sudeste de la Patagonia6
- Caviomorphs (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from Pampa Castillo, Chile: new octodontoid records and biochronological implications5
- Colhuehuapian rodents from Gran Barranca and other Patagonian localities: the state of the art5
- Bioestratigrafia de la fauna de mamíferos de las Formaciones Socorro, Urumaco y Codore (Mioceno medio - Plioceno temprno)de la región de Urumaco, Falcon, Venezuela5
- A new fossil mammal assemblage from the southern Chilean Andes: implications for geology, geochronology, and tectonics5
- Cavioids, Chinchilloids, and Erethizontoids (Hystricognathi, Rodentia, Mammalia) of the Early Miocene Pampa Castillo Fauna, Chile3
Each of the 129 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 35 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Neoepiblemidae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Neoepiblemidae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Neoepiblemidae was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
The description on this site
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itChinchilloidea through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Kraglievich 1926