Notostrea
No picture of Notostrea was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Notostrea, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- OstreidaePBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Ostreidae
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Ostreidae
- Motility
- stationary, attachedPBDB, for Ostreidae
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Bivalvia
- Environment
- hypersaline,marine,brackishPBDB, for Ostreidae
Time the record covers
At least 46 million years on record.
The record covers at least 52 Mya to 5.333 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 56 Mya to 3.6 Mya.
21 occurrences of Notostrea on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
21 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
8 formations
- Red Bluff Tuff Formation · Kekerione Group4
- Te Whanga Limestone Formation · Kekerione Group4
- Wilson Bluff Formation4
- Tutuiri Greensand Formation · Tioriori Group3
- Tumaio Limestone Formation · Tioriori Group2
- Tajima Formation2
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Notostrea has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Notostrea and its relatives
EoceneWhere Notostrea and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
138 taxa- Spondylus7 sites
- Apatopygus6 sites
- Chlamys6 sites
- Eucidaris6 sites
- Terebratella6 sites
- Serripecten tiorioriensis4 sites
- Teredinidae4 sites
- Acesta3 sites
- Chlamys mercuria3 sites
- Eburneopecten3 sites
- Limatula (Limatuletta)3 sites
- Pectinidae3 sites
- Perotrochus3 sites
- Pratulum3 sites
- Probolarina3 sites
- Tegulorhynchia squamosa3 sites
- Terebratulina suessi3 sites
- Tioriorithyris chathamensis3 sites
- Acesta (Acesta)2 sites
- Amussiopecten praesignis2 sites
- Arca2 sites
- Barbatia2 sites
- Bathylasma rangatira2 sites
- Callista (Callista) chinensis2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 16 sites for Notostrea, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
5 references- Cretaceous-Cenozoic geology and biostratigraphy of the Chatham Islands, New Zealand13
- Geology of the Western Australian part of the Eucla basin4
- Pliocene marine fauna from Tane-ga-shima, South Kyushu, Japan2
- A shallow, warm-water calcitic molluscan fauna from an Early Oligocene seamount, North Otago, New Zealand1
- Molluscan biogeography and biostratigraphy of the Tertiary of southeastern Australia1
Each of the 21 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Notostrea was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Notostrea, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Notostrea was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itOstreidae through timeFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Finlay 1928)