Orchocladina
No picture of Orchocladina was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Orchocladina, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- LithistidaPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Lithistida
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Lithistida
- Motility
- stationary, attachedPBDB, for Lithistida
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Porifera
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Lithistida
Time the record covers
At least 371 million years on record.
The record covers at least 508.2 Mya to 137.05 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 516 Mya to 132.6 Mya.
713 occurrences of Orchocladina on record, most of them in the Ordovician. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
713 occurrences- Cambrian4%
- Ordovician54%
- Silurian15%
- Devonian7%
- Carboniferousunder 1%
- Permian14%
- Late Triassic6%
- Early Jurassicunder 1%
- Late Jurassicunder 1%
- Early Cretaceousunder 1%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
123 formations
- San Juan Formation77
- Delorme Formation51
- Mingan Formation38
- Cape Phillips Formation36
- Bone Spring Formation36
- Malongulli Formation28
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Orchocladina has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 99 further formations hold fewer occurrences each and are not listed. 48 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Orchocladina and its relatives
OrdovicianWhere Orchocladina and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.
Found in the same rock
2,565 taxa- Archaeoscyphia42 sites
- Girvanella31 sites
- Solenopora30 sites
- Eospongia28 sites
- Glyptorthis bellarugosa24 sites
- Oepikina minnesotensis24 sites
- Rhipidomena tennesseensis24 sites
- Stromatomorpha23 sites
- Tetradium23 sites
- Bryozoa22 sites
- Gastropoda21 sites
- Brachiopoda20 sites
- Dinorthis interstriata20 sites
- Dinorthis transversa20 sites
- Mimella globosa20 sites
- Multicostella platys20 sites
- Ostracoda19 sites
- Defordia densa17 sites
- Maclurites magnus17 sites
- Paurorthis17 sites
- Valcourea17 sites
- Chasmatopora16 sites
- Rhinidictya15 sites
- Astraeomorpha crassisepta14 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 316 sites for Orchocladina, and this reads 240 of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
154 references- Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region: The siliceous sponges69
- Silurian (Wenlock) demosponges from the Avalanche Lake area of the Mackenzie Mountains, southwestern District of Mackenzie, Northwest Territories, Canada53
- Lower and Middle Ordovician lithistid demosponges from the Mingan Islands, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Quebec, Canada38
- Stratigraphy of the Lower Middle Ordovician of Tazewell County, Virginia36
- Middle Silurian Ludlovian and Wenlockian sponges from Baillie-Hamilton and Cornwallis Islands, Arctic Canada29
- Late Ordovician sponges from the Malongulli Formation of central New South Wales, Australia28
- Epizoan-sponge Interactions in the Early Ordovician of the Argentine Precordillera26
- El genero Reinversella (Brachiopoda) en el Ordovicico temprano de la Precordillera Argentina y su significado paleobiogeografico22
- Late Devonian sponges of Western Australia20
- Ordovician lithistid sponges of the Great Basin18
- The Lower Ordovician sponges of San Juan, Argentina17
- Trilobite biostratigraphy and correlation of the Kindblade Formation (Lower Ordovician) of Carter and Kiowa Counties, Oklahoma14
Each of the 713 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 142 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Orchocladina was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Orchocladina, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Orchocladina was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itLithistida through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Rauff 1895