Palaeophycus tubularis

No picture of Palaeophycus tubularis was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Palaeophycus tubularis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
PalaeophycusPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 497 million years on record.

The record covers at least 538.8 Mya to 41.03 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 635 Mya to 37.71 Mya.

Cambrian — about 13 of 32 occurrencesCambrianOrdovician — about 2 of 32 occurrencesSilurian — about 0 of 32 occurrencesDevonian — about 0 of 32 occurrencesCarboniferous — about 1 of 32 occurrencesCarboniferousPermian — about 0 of 32 occurrencesEarly Triassic — about 0 of 32 occurrencesMiddle Triassic — about 0 of 32 occurrencesLate Triassic — about 0 of 32 occurrencesEarly Jurassic — about 1 of 32 occurrencesMiddle Jurassic — about 8 of 32 occurrencesLate Jurassic — about 0 of 32 occurrencesEarly Cretaceous — about 1 of 32 occurrencesLate Cretaceous — about 2 of 32 occurrencesPaleocene — about 0 of 32 occurrencesEocene — about 1 of 32 occurrencesOligocene — about 0 of 32 occurrences647–626 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences626–606 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences606–585 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences585–564 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences564–543 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences543–523 Mya — about 6 occurrences523–502 Mya — about 7 occurrences502–481 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences481–461 Mya — about 1 occurrence378–357 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences357–336 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences212–191 Mya — about 1 occurrence191–171 Mya — about 8 occurrences129–109 Mya — about 1 occurrence88–67 Mya — about 2 occurrences67–46 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences46–26 Mya — about 1 occurrence538.8 Mya41.03 Mya647 Mya26 Mya

32 occurrences of Palaeophycus tubularis on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

32 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

16 formations

Opalinuston — 47.43°N, 8.15°EOpalinuston — 47.37°N, 7.78°EOpalinuston — 47.68°N, 8.52°ELaeso — 55.00°N, 15.07°EHardeberga — 55.00°N, 15.07°EOcieseki Sandstone — 50.90°N, 20.90°EPlatonovskaya — 65.82°N, 87.98°ESnowy Plains — 37.01°S, 146.22°EClemente — 30.40°N, 111.95°WXiaoyan — 29.81°N, 118.03°EOchre Cove — 47.66°N, 52.94°WLittle Bell Island — 47.57°N, 52.97°WGendulain — 42.77°N, 1.80°WLufeng — 24.94°N, 102.00°EYacoraite — 23.63°S, 65.40°WWood Canyon — 36.40°N, 116.10°W6 — 36.05°N, 103.25°EBlueflower — 63.39°N, 128.48°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Palaeophycus tubularis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Palaeophycus tubularis and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Palaeophycus tubularis and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

58 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 19 sites for Palaeophycus tubularis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

14 references

Each of the 32 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 2 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Palaeophycus tubularis was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Palaeophycus tubularis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Palaeophycus tubularis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hall 1847